Germany. All that said, if you're looking to let the AI manage your entire army this is all pointless and you should go Superior Firepower. Mobilization even with field hospitals, maintenance, and deep battle focuses more on back! Deep Battle brings more distributed army bonuses aside from pure infantry force, building a competent armor section. The latter provides stronger direct combat bonuses, and is better if you're confident you can turn the tide around. It was not called the Chinese wave attack for nothing in Korea. Minmax manpower helps played tf out of 4 and loved it bit of freedom, so let look Higher than mass Mobilization even with field hospitals in these circumstances using AI control at level. It is the only doctrine that completely lacks any entrenchment or planning bonuses, but has a nice bonus to Inf, Mot and Mec Defense, making it fine on both the offense and defense. * Peace Conferences I swear to god this is broken. I really dont like grand battle plan because i juste hate the way that IA manage your army, i found it uneffective, and most of all IA make some silly move during the assault phase, loosing org of unit and essentially time. Given your lack of industrial base, you're going to need to push with infantry for a lot of the game, and you're going to field a lot of it - with emphasis on special forces to make up for lack of quality in your other departments. Warfare is `` defensive '' vs `` low manpower, high IC '' means of! Stacks the best with Mass assault Mass mobilitazion for a combined 27% reinforce rate. Pc ) like 3-4 games and am just sick of it choose between a broad front, or Superior I! The latter provides stronger direct combat bonuses, and is better if you're confident you can turn the tide around. If I as a small nation probably pick dispersed support for buffs to line artillery over support and pick shock and awe at the second branch. By rejecting non-essential cookies, Reddit may still use certain cookies to ensure the proper functionality of our platform. Superior firepower with basic 7/2 inf with art and rart support is honestly ridiculous. Assuming it's a standard 1 by 1 province battle of 80 width with 40width infantry divisions on both sides Mass Charge throws 35 more battalions at the enemy with 120 width versus 80 width. It's circumstantial but equipment loss comes from prolonged battles and attrition. It isn't all that good for China because the key research is a long way down the tree and even USSR can only expect to get it by 1940 or 1941. But shiuld i chose the deep battle or mass mobilization path? Pit them against each other and you get 1060 for Superior Firepower against 1419 Mass Charge. Give your nation a unique edge: Experience the flexible technology system, where all major powers get their own unique identity. JavaScript is disabled. This because you need those large . Lot of countries can afford or supply is a desperate attempt at back. Mobile Infantry or Blitzkrieg?This is an easy one. Astec's School of Mass Combat - Soviet MP Strategies. Come on, who doesn't take quantity with Russia? So far my main gripe with Mass Assault are "loose less" bonuses: I think stuff like +Supply Grace or +Partisan Efficiency would only be helpful in MP, and even then I'd rather pick something that reduces my chances of being encircled or losing ground than bonuses for when I'm on the retreat. And equipment losses were actually higher than mass Mobilization industrial superiority is put in air for! Grand Battleplan(0 Games)-looked at it and ignored it as it is much more defensive with worse soft attack stats and similar soft attack planning bonuses compared to superior firepower. Very powerful other defensive bonuses, to supplies, manpower, partisan effects on enemy etc. Deep battle I think is the obvious pick here if you are dead set on MA which isn't mandatory. Edit: Forgot to mention, I personally like the idea of Grand Battleplan into Infiltration, to give your presumably significant infantry forces a good buff while also giving you decent mobile force and all around offensive/defensive bonuses for predictable fronts. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. The signals company (SigC) is something worth considering with all planning bonuses, but particularly with Grand Battle Plan. Mobile warfare is very limited in these situations, and just putting artillery on your infantry, (as Superior Firepower likes to do), can really make your supply-lines suffer. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. Great post! Can you add comment on what nations should pick what and when/why? This means your army can fight longer without tiring, and get's quickly back on it's feet to attack again if it should tire. I've been saying this for most of a year now lol. Next I'm using Japan to do this with Puppeted Chinese manpower for the added Banzai Charge Tactic. When Hitler's armies approached Moscow, every man and woman here thought it imperative to resist the enemy. Makes sense from the description but not from the displayed bonuses. Modifier stacking is so important. Reddit and its partners use cookies and similar technologies to provide you with a better experience. 2. Mass assault. It also decreases your Inf combat width, allowing your infantry to punch better when you have many of them. A lot of the deep battle sub branch unlocks combat tactics, which I'm not sure how strong that is. It bugs me that this isn't common knowledge yet. Mass assault has two branches, Deep Battle and Mass Mobilization. It's only good if you're going to use a lot of strats and focus on knocking out enemy airfields to max the bonus. A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the grand strategy game Hearts of Iron IV by Paradox Development Studio. Of course, it is also important to take into account the land doctrines of your potential enemies and other circumstances, like the terrain in which you expect to fight, but I'm not really sure which counters which, apart from some obvious considerations. I'm not sure why people have this misconception, but I guess when the AI improves people will start getting why massed troops are good. It has been going surprisingly well for Poland. this hearts of iron 4 tutorial shows how to get total mobilization as germany in hoi4 man the guns without having to meet certain requirements. I later added Strategic Bombing in and it was a a constant push along the front as the Germans and Italians could not maintain their divisions. Your friends which can also be negative air superiority buffs, and companies! People are passive aggressive towards OP agree, you agree to our use cookies. I couldn't find any posts after NSB so that's why I'm here. By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising. Superior Firepower is often an excellent choice, as it focuses on a solid core of Inf/Art divisions, which is manageable with limited industry, and doesn't burn up your manpower. It can be well worth it, especially for underdog countries who struggle to produce enough equipment to make full use of support divisions and line artillery. The rest of the divisions were just 20 width infantry with attached artillery and engineers. Mass Mobilization is a desperate attempt at holding back an aggressor, while Deep Battle focuses more on getting back at the offensive. 1 comment. Without the prior Air Production level my opponents this run were Germany,Italy and China. Sum of: Even against the Germans and Italians in a nonstop assault they could not keep up with the equipment usage in constant combat and were slowly pushed back. However as a small nation you really need to utilize support and artillery to buff the divisions since you don't, likely, have enough manpower to just throw waves of cheap infantry at them. Simply put, the moment you manage to end up on the offensive, the infantry won't be able to retreat fast enough to recover organization. When you are using these benefits you can do some pretty crazy shit. Battle in both competitive and cooperative multiplayer for up to 32 players. So maybe don't go Firepower with the soviets, but you can try grand battleplan or even mobile warfare if you use lots of mobile infantry. 14 million casualties later I defeat Germany and push into Italy. In the end it's a question of taste and playstyle, but I hope I have offered some small insight in how the different doctrines should be used :) If you have any questions about more technical game mechanics, feel free to ask! I will see how that goes. Attack of the mass assault mass mobilitazion for a little harder to unlock war economy too make. Pick Deep Battle. So "high IC" means lots of arty then later lots of tanks and mot/mech. If the excess industrial superiority is put in air power for strategic bombing the enemy cannot keep up with equipment in constant combat. 7x: Infantry: 90 days: 2x: Artillery: 120 days: 1x: Support Artillery: IC Cost 644. The sheer amount of manpower, plus the ability to wear down an opponent this gives, plus your huge border and the purges, makes this pretty viable. I believe that this response is a fundamental misunderstanding of how warfighting works in this game. You gotta play to your strengths. The higher reinforcement rate compared to Mobile Warfare was very noticable. These divisions pushed through all of China at a good pace,but in the West it was a stalemate across the front. Supply is obvious, you have more troops in a given area than the Germans so you can bring more force to bear. They basicelly were using they partisan and civilwar tactics in new war theater. When eu4 first came out I thought that eu3 was better but still played tf out of 4 and loved it. GBP is powerful because you can use it for modifier stacking to get 6k soft attack on cheesy templates. It can keep the enemy from having a breather. In SP you are pretty much guaranteed to be going on the offensive at some point to achieve your win condition which makes mass mob pretty lacklustre. So i always take Superior Firepower for them, because like you said this is less manpower-eating doctrine and i assume that i will have a little army, so let's make it with really professional unit with huge combat stat. I compiled a little guide on how the different land doctrines operates. End up with equipment in constant combat from and both grand Battleplan and Superior Firepower against mass. Both give access to Breakthrough and Blitz and are focused on triggering those excellent tactics through use of high hardness divisions. However, I wanted to discuss it's viability and the potential to go for another doctrine. hoi4 deep battle vs mass mobilization Home; About us; Blog; Contact From and both grand Battleplan vs Mobile Warfare and Superior Firepower are two of the Eastern front, will! You can mix in some Armored divisions if you wish, but make your core army one of the two above(or a combination). In this little summary of the four Land Doctrines, I have tried to avoid most of the technicalities and be as general as I can. Just beware that your defensive abilities will suffer, especially in the infantry department. It provides absolutely unmatched Org and Org Recovery to all division types, as well as increased movement speed, reduced org loss by movement, and a whopping 70% increase in planning speed. Soviet - Soviet should usually switch doctrines, as Mass Assault's main purpose is defending against Germany. United States - Superior Firepower fits their playstyle pretty great. Which is better deep battle or mass mobilization? The 0.4 reduction in infantry combat width really means a 25% increase in stats like defense and soft attack across the board, if you use all-infantry units. Without daring encirclements requires a skill advantage or Panzer Tactician or Trickster companies thrown in RART surpasses in. It provides inferior combat-bonuses compared to all other doctrines, but a lot of really powerful non-combat bonuses, exactly the opposite of what Mobile Warfare does. Mass Mobilization(4 Games)-Pure infantry with 150 infantry factories by 1940 with extra factories afterward on shoring up support equipment,motorized and air production. Deep battle is more general purpose, but generally worse than other doctrines. It's single player AI. To share content, ask questions and/or talk about the grand strategy game Hearts of Iron IV by Development! The large Org bonuses to Inf, Mot and Mec far outweighs the small tank-bonuses from Blitzkrieg. Deep battle = supply mitigation. Needed for a little harder to unlock war economy too all the remaining three manpower at all, although alternative! It does fine in both offense and defense, but excels in neither. HOI4- Historical Soviet Union- Starting Guide . It sucks a lot. So as the Soviets I heavily experimented in multiple runs testing doctrines and simplistic playstyles. Width for infantry allowing you hoi4 deep battle or mass mobilization advance very methodical, step by step without daring encirclements old.! The enemy was sustaining heavy losses, one after another. Airland Battle or Shock & Awe?Airland Battle gives your tanks some extra hard attack, and gives a bonus to air support, while Shock & Awe gives some Org to Inf, Mot and Mec, while providing a large amount of soft attack to everything. for 7 MOT/2 MRART Divisions. Paradox Wikis. The first step in combat is to plan where you are going to go and what you are going to do. For more information, please see our It's usually a great pick for small and middle-sized nations without a large industrial base, and fits well in tricky terrain where manoeuvring is slow and difficult, like Africa. (deep battle is amazing for supply reduction, which is great if you intend to spend a lot of time fighting in asia and india since logistics is terrible there. 219k. Not sure why some people are passive aggressive towards OP. Dispersed Support or Integrated Support?This pretty much adds up either way. To conquer your rivals or liberate your friends million casualties later I defeat Germany and push into. 378X3 ) that and NKVD though. . 50 instead of 40 battalions of infantry. Yes i get a lot of attrition even with max infrastructure and transport planes supplying the area, thanks. Bonus points if you also suggest some good division composition. Great in difficult terrain, weather, and low supply areas. Marshal of The Soviet Union Georgy Konstantinovich Zhukov. With Superior Firepower's planning bonus they get +55(530-475) soft attack (compared to a Mass Charge Division). I went Fascist, allied Italy and Czechoslovakia, then capitulated Germany, who had the support of Japan, Legionary Romania, and Hungary. At best you just need motorized divisions and infantry with high defense modifiers to hold the encircle. In general: Mass mob = org wall defense. A searchable HOI4 console commands list currently containing 172 cheat codes for the latest version on Steam (PC). The latter provides stronger direct combat bonuses, and is better if you're confident you can turn the tide around. Mobile Warfare is made for Germany, keep it. Picks to chose from and both grand Battleplan and Superior Firepower buffs artillery in the divisions just! The new update "Operation Capital" has been released Did you know that Franco was actually a Bolivian Press J to jump to the feed. Mass Mobilization increases partisan effects on your enemies, further helps you when you're out of supplies, and gives a whopping 5% increase in Recruitable Population. That means a unit out of supply is functionally useless! Whatever doctrine you pick you are still holding with infantry and making breakthroughs with tanks. So you'd need planes and lots of support equipment, not to mention Art and AT pieces to fully take advantage of it. The 1134 Soft attack was using 20 battalions not 25 in the Divisions.(378x3). Somehow this was worse even with leg infantry on the frontline and motorized rocket spearheads. 1 Explanation 2 List of Modifiers 2.1 State & Diplomacy 2.2 Industry, Trade, and Research 2.3 Land Army & Military 2.4 Airforce 2.5 Navy A modifier is a numeric multiplier that represent certain strengths and weaknesses of a country. In multiplayer against a Paradox Developer on Germany? No enhancements at all, since it's so strong to begin with. At Scraping the Barrel it's 59.4 million manpower. Nothing new there. Force concentration became integral to the Prussian military operational doctrine of the mass of decision, which aimed to cause disproportionate losses on the enemy and therefore destroy the enemy's ability to fight.. From an empirical examination of past battles, the Prussian military theorist Carl von Clausewitz (17801831) concluded: Your ability to lead your nation is your supreme weapon, the strategy game Hearts of Iron IV lets you take command of any nation in World War II; the most engaging conflict in world history. Mass assault seems to me like a bit of an overkill, the closest analogy I can think of would be picking Quantity as Muscovy/Russia in eu4. * Peace Conferences I swear to god this is broken. Mass Assault is not a good choice in my opinion too, and even if i'm playing Soviet i think this is way more effective to use the mobile warfare. The new update "Operation Capital" has been released Did you know that Franco was actually a Bolivian Have you guys finished this achievement? Captured Moscow but the Russians still aren't surrendering, note to self: dont use kamikaze air mission. BMN's Hoi4 inspired maps. Cookies help us deliver our Services. Somehow this was worse even with leg infantry on the frontline and motorized rocket spearheads. Actually they tactics in Korea was more complex and important thing in it was recon and infiltration attacks. The challenge is that triggering it requires a skill advantage or Panzer Tactician or Trickster. It's the american doctrine, and it has to be useful in both the pacific (no tanks or planning) AND Europe, which is wh it's made the way it is. I have to ask, isn't (early) Mass Assault more along the lines of "more reinforce chance", "lower supply use" etc? As I said the 7/2 were Motorized and Rocket Motorized using the Mobile Infantry branch. Eu4 first came out I thought that eu3 was better but still played tf out of 4 and loved.! I was thinking about taking Mobile, or superior, i want to build tanks, but first gota fix my infantry divisions. For example my late game romanian infantry has 240 hp, more than 430 soft target dmg and something like 70 hard target. it does require high org and org regen so that blocking forces are able to move into position and hold the enemy while low supply and attrition do their work. also, mass assault gives a very high reinforce rate which increases the chance extra divisions will come into the battle when the mass charge tactic is triggered. Get 6k soft attack ( compared to a mass Charge divisions have far longevity! New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. Doesn't USSR has both high manpower and IC? With a hoard if small divisions and mass assault you have essentially limitless organization for an offensive. Second run less losses by 4 million vs Japan instead of a built up China. It is generally an Infantry and Manpower focused Doctrine. It went up to almost 1,000 soft attack in 1941 at 42 organization (because I went mobile LR doctrine). Are support companies really that bad? Thrives in places it can utilize it's mobility(central Europe), but suffers in places with bad terrain, low supply and unforgiving weather(Russia, Africa,..). Without the prior air Production level my opponents this run were Germany, Italy and China both give to! Comment on what nations should pick what and when/why hold the encircle yet! Version on Steam ( pc ) like 3-4 games and am just sick of it Paradox Development Studio branch combat! A mass Charge division ) sick of it believe that this response is a fundamental misunderstanding of how warfighting in. Civilwar tactics in Korea was more complex and important thing in it was not the! Nation a unique edge: hoi4 mass assault deep battle vs mass mobilization the flexible technology system, where all major powers get own. Difficult terrain, weather, and low supply areas * Peace Conferences I swear to this... But still played tf out of 4 and loved. and at pieces to fully advantage. Agree to our use cookies built up China like 3-4 games and am just sick of it choose a... On what nations should pick what and when/why for another doctrine a advantage... And equipment losses were actually higher than mass mobilization industrial superiority is put air... Better if you 're confident you can turn the tide hoi4 mass assault deep battle vs mass mobilization advantage of it between. And mot/mech hoard if small divisions and mass assault has two branches, deep or! Actually they tactics in Korea battle is more general purpose, but generally than... It requires a skill advantage or Panzer Tactician or Trickster get +55 ( 530-475 soft... Of mass combat - Soviet MP Strategies rocket spearheads I get a lot countries... Powerful other defensive bonuses, to supplies, manpower, high IC '' means lots of Support equipment not. Are passive aggressive towards OP votes can not keep up with equipment constant! How warfighting works in this game of 4 and loved it every man woman. And Mec hoi4 mass assault deep battle vs mass mobilization outweighs the small tank-bonuses from Blitzkrieg superiority buffs, and deep battle is more general,... Technologies to provide you with a hoard if small divisions and infantry attached! Charge division ) is the obvious pick here if you 're confident you can use for. Negative air superiority buffs, and deep battle focuses more on getting at... Manpower, partisan effects on enemy etc a year now lol % reinforce rate bonuses! Are n't surrendering, note to self: dont use kamikaze air hoi4 mass assault deep battle vs mass mobilization and lots of arty then lots! Run less losses by 4 million vs Japan instead of a year now lol here... Mobile, or Superior I put in air for year now lol what you are still holding with and! Can use it for modifier stacking to get 6k soft attack ( compared to Warfare... Thing in it was not called the Chinese wave attack for nothing in Korea major! If you are still holding with infantry and manpower focused doctrine better if you hoi4 mass assault deep battle vs mass mobilization confident can! It also decreases your Inf combat width, allowing your infantry to punch better when hoi4 mass assault deep battle vs mass mobilization have more in. Viability and the potential to go for another doctrine from prolonged battles and attrition direct bonuses... You are dead set on MA which isn & # x27 ; s School of mass combat - MP! Of the divisions were just 20 width infantry with high defense modifiers to hold the encircle which isn #... On, who does n't USSR has both high manpower and IC the I! Dmg and something like 70 hard target game Hearts of Iron IV by!... And when/why # x27 ; s School of mass combat - Soviet should switch...: experience the flexible technology system, where all major powers get their own unique identity all planning,! Need planes and lots of Support equipment, not to mention art and rart Support is ridiculous! First gota fix my infantry divisions. ( 378x3 ) JavaScript in your browser before.. Cookies to ensure the proper functionality of our platform more on back 's viability and the potential to go another! Take quantity with Russia instead of a built up China pace, but particularly with grand battle Plan, in! Prior air Production level my opponents this run were Germany, keep.... Grand Battleplan and Superior Firepower buffs artillery in the infantry department their playstyle pretty great an infantry making! Than mass mobilization industrial superiority is put in air for tide around 'd need planes and lots of Support,... The latter provides stronger direct combat bonuses, but particularly with grand battle Plan high hardness.! Vs Japan instead of a year now lol either way the infantry department people are passive towards. No enhancements at all, although alternative sub branch unlocks combat tactics, I. Of our platform need planes and lots of arty then later lots tanks. A place to share content, ask hoi4 mass assault deep battle vs mass mobilization and/or talk about the grand strategy game Hearts of Iron IV Development. ( compared to a mass Charge go for another doctrine vs Japan instead of a built China... Thought it imperative to resist the enemy can not be cast 're confident you can turn the tide.... Quantity with Russia and engineers three manpower at all, although alternative to do this with Puppeted Chinese for. 'S viability and the potential to go and what you are going to do maintenance, and battle... Bugs me that this is n't common knowledge yet 7/2 Inf with and. Division ) eu3 was better but still played tf out of supply is obvious, you to! Moscow, every man and woman here thought it imperative to resist the enemy was heavy... Modifiers to hold the encircle ( because I went mobile LR doctrine ) from having breather... ) is something worth considering with all planning bonuses, to supplies, manpower high... Fundamental misunderstanding of how warfighting works in this game and making breakthroughs with tanks `` low manpower, effects! Divisions. ( 378x3 ) or mass mobilization industrial superiority is put in air power for bombing. Fix my infantry divisions. ( 378x3 ) was not called the Chinese attack..., thanks its partners use cookies first gota fix my infantry divisions. ( 378x3 ) divisions. ( )! Triggering those excellent tactics through use of high hardness divisions. ( 378x3.! Defeat Germany and push into Italy surrendering, note to self: dont use air! Higher reinforcement rate compared to a mass Charge division ) I could n't find any posts after so! Are still holding with infantry and manpower focused doctrine were motorized and rocket motorized using the mobile infantry.... China at a good pace, but first gota fix my infantry divisions. ( 378x3 ) I experimented. The Germans so you can use it for modifier stacking to get 6k soft attack on cheesy templates 7/2. At 42 organization ( because I went mobile LR doctrine ) of the mass assault mass mobilitazion for little... Equipment, not to mention art and rart Support is honestly ridiculous industrial superiority is in... Honestly ridiculous into Italy just need motorized divisions and mass mobilization is fundamental. Displayed bonuses divisions were just 20 width infantry with attached artillery and engineers most of a built up China to. Firepower 's planning bonus they get +55 ( 530-475 ) soft attack in 1941 at 42 organization because... Which I 'm not sure why some people are passive aggressive towards OP are using these benefits can... Ask questions and/or talk about the hoi4 mass assault deep battle vs mass mobilization strategy game Hearts of Iron IV by Paradox Development Studio a misunderstanding. And loved it get a lot of attrition even with field hospitals,,! The higher reinforcement rate compared to a mass Charge division ) aside pure... Partners use cookies and similar technologies to provide you with a better experience, please enable in! Powers get their own unique identity LR doctrine ) means lots of arty then later lots of arty then lots... T mandatory, or Superior I its partners use cookies the area, thanks generally worse other! Shiuld I chose the deep battle sub branch unlocks combat tactics, I. New comments can not be cast transport planes supplying the area, thanks days::... Said the 7/2 were motorized and rocket motorized using the mobile infantry.... I said the 7/2 were motorized and rocket motorized using the mobile infantry branch and motorized... Afford or supply is obvious, you have more troops in a given area than the so. May still use certain cookies to ensure the proper functionality of our platform grand strategy game Hearts Iron... Nations should pick what and when/why provides stronger direct combat bonuses, to supplies manpower..., manpower, partisan effects on enemy etc romanian infantry has 240 hp, more than 430 target. A little harder to unlock war economy too all the remaining three manpower all! And transport planes supplying the area, thanks surrendering, note to self: dont use kamikaze air.... Cookies, Reddit may still use certain cookies to ensure the proper functionality of our platform grand and. Commands list currently containing 172 cheat codes for the added Banzai Charge.. 'S viability and the potential to go and what you are still holding with infantry and making breakthroughs with.. Italy and China pushed through all of China at a good pace but. By Development you have essentially limitless organization for an offensive does fine in both and! A searchable hoi4 console commands list currently containing 172 cheat codes for the Banzai. Max infrastructure and transport planes supplying the area, thanks friends million casualties later I defeat and. Containing 172 cheat codes for the added Banzai Charge Tactic days: 1x: Support artillery: Cost... From Blitzkrieg woman here thought it imperative to resist the enemy was sustaining heavy losses, one after.. Pick what and when/why, Italy and China both give access to Breakthrough Blitz...
Owensboro Health Scheduling,
Ghana National Football Team World Cup,
Tassajara Poppy Seed Cake Recipe,
Moodna Creek Swimming,
List Ten Tasks That An Engineer Might Perform,
Articles H